Zia ud Din:
A Peace agreement often loses its credibility when it fails to recognize the rights of the oppressed. This is the case with President Trump’s much-surfaced Ghaza peace plan. Far from being a genuine step toward peace, it presents a surrender document that legitimizes Israel’s long-standing occupation of Palestine. Sadly, this so-called peace plan was endorsed by major Muslim countries, including Pakistan.
While standing with Trump, Netanyahu, accused of war crimes, accepted the plan and also threatened to finish the job if Hamas does not accept the plan wholeheartedly. However, outrage sparked among various analysts when Netanyahu claimed victory in Hebrew language at Tel Aviv. The question arises: How can Trump propose a plan for peace without involving an international arbitrator—the United Nations Organisation? Critics have rejected this plan on various grounds.
First, the plan has no two-state solution. In fact, it blurs the possibility of an independent Palestinian state in the future. Sadly, Netanyahu has already repudiated the idea of an independent state. Also, President Trump called Palestine recognition by France, Britain, Canada, and Spain a reward to Hamas. So far, the United States has stopped Israel from occupying the West Bank, but some government officials of Netanyahu intended to do so.
Second, Hamas and the Palestine National Authority, the only representatives of Ghaza and the West Bank, have been eliminated in the process. Even the United States barred the Palestinian Authority from entering New York during the UNGA annual session. It reflects the colonial plan because peace is mutual; it cannot be imposed at the dictate of aggressors. Zahid Hussain in his essay pointed out that it practically brings to an end the concept of a Palestinian state.
Third, in the post-war administration, both Hamas and PA have no share. The proposed plan contains the demilitarization of Hamas. They can live in peaceful coexistence after getting amnesty, and also safe passage will be given to those who want to exit. What kind of peace is this, where those who suffer have no voice in the decisions that shape their future? This is total surrender to be forced on the group.
Fourth, this official instrument lost its credibility when the UN was excluded. It discredits the international organization. Although the question are raised about the ineffective role of the UN—unable to stop genocide—its sanctity must prevail. Critics always blamed the United States. For instance, every time the US vetoed a resolution to stop Israel’s evil deeds.
Fifth, Hamas has been given the ultimatum of 72 hours to accept the plan. It is not a plan but a surrender charter for the group. It means Hamas has no choice but to go with the plan. They are not consulted on their fate. The Trump-Netanyahu plan has fortified Israel further. It openly advocates for Greater Israel.
Sixth, this plan also outlines that Ghaza will be governed by a political committee under the supervision of a Board of Peace which will be headed by Donald Trump and Tony Blair. Tony Blair, the former prime minister of the UK during 2003, had been widely criticized for the invasion of Iraq based on false claims about weapons of mass destruction. He is regarded as a war criminal in the UK as well as in the Muslim world. Therefore, his appointment provoked worldwide criticism.
Seventh, no future guarantee is mentioned in the proposed framework. It fails to prevent Israel from occupying. Most important, the aggressor’s accountability has not been outlined. In fact, Israel has impunity in its every action. The President assured Tel Aviv that they can do what they want if Hamas rejects the plan.
Eighth, no recognition, no peace. Durable peace hinges on the recognition of Palestine. Both the US and Israel have rejected recognition. Seemingly, they have no plan to recognize Palestine in the near future. The record of history demonstrates that illegal occupation and peace cannot move together. Peace remains impossible without an end to illegal occupation.
On the positive side of the plan, if this project is implemented, it will end ruthless killing and Ghaza genocide. The aid blockade will be drawn. The supporters of this plan also cited the same reason. The deputy prime minister, Ishaq Dar, also said that the first priority of Pakistan is to end uncontrolled killing of Ghazans. He further said that we are on a bid to remove all Netanyahu’s excuses to continue war.
In the end, occupation, annexation, and illegal settlements cannot run with peace. Two states are the only answer to long-term peace. This controversial plan is biased and destined to crumble. Ghazans cannot be left to the mercy of warmongers. It is a wake-up call for the United States and the World to let Ghazans live a free life in their own independent state. Netanyahu’s transgression must not go with impunity. The only solution lies in an independent Palestinian state.
The writer can be contacted through: dinziaud19@gmail.com
